| Active : 8 Machines / 16 Threads / 0.11 MNPS | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority 0 | ||||||
| Cremag | Leela-lc5 | lc5-implementation | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: 1.05 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 3.00] Games: 7028 W: 1779 L: 1710 D: 3539 Ptnml(0-2): 3, 673, 2097, 734, 7 | lc5 step 15: TwoFoldDraws=contained vs root |
| Cremag | Leela-lc5 | lc5-implementation | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: 0.41 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 3.00] Games: 5154 W: 1257 L: 1224 D: 2673 Ptnml(0-2): 4, 537, 1466, 562, 8 | lc5 step 16: puct-dag vs puct, HistoryKeyLength=1 |
| Cremag | Leela-lc5 | lc5-implementation | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: -0.05 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 3.00] Games: 7336 W: 1834 L: 1822 D: 3680 Ptnml(0-2): 7, 722, 2197, 736, 6 | lc5 step 14: StickyEndgames=true vs false |
| Cremag | Leela-lc5 | lc5-implementation | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: -0.98 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 3.00] Games: 5154 W: 1226 L: 1268 D: 2660 Ptnml(0-2): 2, 552, 1516, 500, 7 | lc5 step 16: Lc5Policy=puct-dag vs puct |
| Finished | ||||||
| Cremag | Leela-lc5 | [Leela] b80da3dd2a44156c7cf62686136e84b47d652c66 | diff | 8.0+0.08 | Elo: -25.58 +- 5.16 (95%) [N=4000] Games: 4000 W: 868 L: 1162 D: 1970 Ptnml(0-2): 2, 614, 1061, 322, 1 | lc5 checkpoint after step 16 (defaults: reselect, MovesLeft) vs classic, same commit |
| Cremag | Leela-lc5 | lc5-implementation | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: 2.96 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 3.00] Games: 8662 W: 2264 L: 2090 D: 4308 Ptnml(0-2): 3, 806, 2544, 970, 8 | lc5 step 12: WaiterResume=reselect vs select |
| Cremag | Leela-lc5 | lc5-implementation | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: -0.47 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 3.00] Games: 9078 W: 2253 L: 2260 D: 4565 Ptnml(0-2): 7, 939, 2651, 938, 4 | lc5 step 13: MovesLeft=true vs false |
| Cremag | Leela-lc5 | lc5-implementation | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: -1.47 (-2.94, 2.94) [-3.00, 0.00] Games: 18042 W: 4451 L: 4564 D: 9027 Ptnml(0-2): 20, 1864, 5352, 1779, 6 | lc5 step 7 (541ad462, back up through one per-node update) vs step 6 (26084902). Pure refactor, identical golden output. |
| Cremag | Leela-lc5 | lc5-implementation | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: -2.95 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 3.00] Games: 1220 W: 214 L: 401 D: 605 Ptnml(0-2): 1, 242, 310, 57, 0 | lc5 step 11: PuctTotals=completed vs started |
| Cremag | Leela-lc5 | lc5-implementation | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: 0.29 (-2.94, 2.94) [-3.00, 0.00] Games: 396 W: 117 L: 103 D: 176 Ptnml(0-2): 1, 26, 129, 42, 0 | lc5 step 10b (fp16 priors) vs step 10a; golden: small PV/depth diffs, node sweep within noise |
| Cremag | Leela-lc5 | lc5-implementation | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: 0.32 (-2.94, 2.94) [-3.00, 0.00] Games: 1504 W: 397 L: 383 D: 724 Ptnml(0-2): 1, 147, 443, 159, 2 | lc5 step 10a (statistics only for tried edges) vs step 9b; pure refactor, golden identical, +25% NPS at 8 threads |
| Cremag | Leela-lc5 | lc5-implementation | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: 0.52 (-2.94, 2.94) [-3.00, 0.00] Games: 7500 W: 1844 L: 1831 D: 3825 Ptnml(0-2): 3, 765, 2203, 774, 5 | lc5 step 9 (template the search on the policy, pure refactor) vs step 8 d5430502 |
| Cremag | Leela-lc5 | lc5-implementation | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: -0.01 (-2.94, 2.94) [-3.00, 0.00] Games: 5810 W: 1465 L: 1477 D: 2868 Ptnml(0-2): 3, 598, 1714, 588, 2 | lc5 step 8: VisitEngine interface (pure refactor) vs step 7 |
| Cremag | Leela-lc5 | lc5-implementation | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: 0.93 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 3.00] Games: 6090 W: 1570 L: 1510 D: 3010 Ptnml(0-2): 2, 572, 1838, 630, 3 | lc5 step 6 (smaller edges: 24 B edges, float means, 16-bit in_flight) vs step 5 |
| Cremag | Leela-lc5 | lc5-implementation | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: 0.59 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 3.00] Games: 6810 W: 1722 L: 1678 D: 3410 Ptnml(0-2): 1, 661, 2042, 695, 6 | lc5 step 5 (38477608): score only started edges plus the first unstarted one, vs step 4. Identical search output; CPU NPS +3.6%. |
| Cremag | Leela-lc5 | lc5-implementation | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: 0.73 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 3.00] Games: 11406 W: 2901 L: 2840 D: 5665 Ptnml(0-2): 5, 1140, 3354, 1197, 7 | lc5 roadmap step 2: finish ready and in-flight backups on stop (b57536c6) vs step 1 (8f890b1e) |
| Cremag | Leela-lc5 | lc5-implementation | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: 0.68 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 3.00] Games: 8256 W: 2061 L: 2009 D: 4186 Ptnml(0-2): 5, 803, 2463, 849, 8 | lc5: count network value on node at install (8f890b1e) vs parent 035c5b78 |
| Cremag | Leela-lc5 | lc5-implementation | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: 0.28 (-2.94, 2.94) [-3.00, 0.00] Games: 11060 W: 2679 L: 2686 D: 5695 Ptnml(0-2): 2, 1109, 3319, 1094, 6 | lc5: one shard lookup per selection step (refactor; same output at fixed nodes) vs its parent (revert of step 3 = step 2 code) |
| Cremag | Leela-lc5 | lc5-implementation | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: -0.18 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 3.00] Games: 54 W: 6 L: 22 D: 26 Ptnml(0-2): 0, 17, 9, 1, 0 | lc5 step 3 (classic time managers, legacy) vs step 2 (b57536c6) |
| Cremag | Leela-lc5 | lc5-implementation | diff | 8.0+0.08 | Elo: 52.51 +- 107.00 (95%) [N=20] Games: 20 W: 7 L: 4 D: 9 Ptnml(0-2): 0, 2, 3, 5, 0 | lc5: count network value on node at install (8f890b1e) vs parent 035c5b78 |
| Cremag | Leela-lc5 | [Leela] lc5-implementation | diff | 8.0+0.08 | Elo: -34.86 +- 78.28 (95%) [N=20] Games: 20 W: 2 L: 4 D: 14 Ptnml(0-2): 0, 3, 6, 1, 0 | Engine-selection check: same commit 035c5b78, dev engine Leela-lc5 (lc5 search) vs base engine Leela (classic search). |
| Cremag | Leela | lc5-implementation | diff | 8.0+0.08 | Elo: -52.51 +- 86.09 (95%) [N=20] Games: 20 W: 2 L: 5 D: 13 Ptnml(0-2): 0, 4, 5, 1, 0 | superminimal: cremagent skill smoke test |
| Crem | Leela | lc5-implementation | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: -2.95 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 3.00] Games: 1290 W: 229 L: 405 D: 656 Ptnml(0-2): 0, 246, 329, 70, 0 | lc5: grow the live visit limit with the tree (ActiveVisitsRatio) Admission stops while live visits reach 16 + ActiveVisitsRatio * root visits (default 0.25), capped by MaxActiveVisits, like classic search's collision scaling. Previously a fresh search admitted all visits at once; they waited on the root and then spread over its children by prior alone. On 80 positions where lc5's game move disagreed with classic at 40k nodes, the share of fresh searches matching classic's move at 256-1024 nodes rose from 28-31% to 38-40% (classic itself: 39%), and was unchanged at 16k-32k. Visits per 300 ms are unaffected. |
| Menkib | Leela-dag-preview | tcec-tune-with-blocking-cuda * | diff | 40.0+0.40 | Tuning 12 Parameters 68479/100000 Iterations 273918/400000 Games Played | |
| Menkib | Leela-dag-preview | tcec-season-30-swiss | diff | 20.0+0.20 | LLR: 0.00 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 3.00] Games: 0 W: 0 L: 0 D: 0 Ptnml(0-2): 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 | Calibration Elo test Dev 3260 vs Base 3320 |
| Menkib | Leela-dag-preview | tcec-season-30-swiss | diff | 20.0+0.20 | LLR: 0.00 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 3.00] Games: 0 W: 0 L: 0 D: 0 Ptnml(0-2): 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 | Calibration Elo test Dev 3260 vs Base 3200 |
| Menkib | Leela-dag-preview | tcec-season-30-swiss | diff | 40.0+0.40 | LLR: -0.62 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 3.00] Games: 45344 W: 11751 L: 11695 D: 21898 Ptnml(0-2): 10, 4520, 13559, 4570, 13 | Calibration Elo test Dev 3320 vs Base 3260 |
| Menkib | Leela-dag-preview | tcec-season-30-swiss | diff | 40.0+0.40 | LLR: -1.68 (-2.94, 2.94) [0.00, 3.00] Games: 78570 W: 20117 L: 20052 D: 38401 Ptnml(0-2): 14, 7830, 23530, 7899, 12 | Calibration Elo test Dev 3320 vs Base 3200 |
| Crem | Leela | lc5-implementation | diff | 8.0+0.08 | Elo: -74.06 +- 35.25 (95%) [N=100] Games: 100 W: 18 L: 39 D: 43 Ptnml(0-2): 2, 20, 25, 3, 0 | lc5: smart pruning, in-search two-fold draws, fewer visits in flight - Stop early when the most visited root move cannot be overtaken by the estimated remaining visits (SmartPruningFactor, default 1.33); unused time is added to the next move's budget. - Score two-fold repetitions whose cycle lies within the search as draws, without marking the root-dependent graph node terminal. - Lower the automatic MaxActiveVisits to max(256, 1.5 * EvalThreads * MinibatchSize). With 1024 visits in flight, a ~5k-visit move was badly diluted: at 10+0.1 vs classic, 1024 scored 6-0-18 for lc0, 256 scored 1-0-23. - Add RestartWaiters (default off): woken waiters select again from the root instead of continuing below the newly evaluated node. |